7/24 Service · Chinese / English

China Commercial Mediation and Settlement: Court-Annexed Mediation, Judicial Confirmation and Enforcement

A settlement reached in Chinese mediation is a contract until the court confirms it — judicial confirmation is what turns the agreed outcome into a ruling with the force of a judgment.

China Commercial Mediation and Settlement: Court-Annexed Mediation, Judicial Confirmation and Enforcement

A settlement is a contract until the court makes it more

Commercial parties in China often assume that a signed settlement reached through mediation is immediately enforceable. It is not — and the distinction between the two stages is the whole subject. A settlement reached in mediation is, at first, a contract between the parties: it binds them in the law of obligations, but it cannot be taken straight to a bailiff. It becomes enforceable only through judicial confirmation (司法确认), a court procedure that turns the agreed outcome into a ruling with the same force as a judgment. Knowing which stage your settlement is in determines what you can do when the other side does not pay.

Judicial confirmation: how a settlement becomes enforceable

The framework is in the Civil Procedure Law, as revised in 2023 and effective 1 January 2024. Article 201 provides that where the parties have reached a mediation agreement through a duly established mediation organisation, they may jointly apply to a court for confirmation, and the application window is 30 days from the date the agreement takes effect, with jurisdiction in the invited court or the basic-level court where a party, the subject matter or the mediation organisation is located (or the intermediate court where that level has jurisdiction). Article 202 then sets out what the court does on review: it may issue a ruling that the agreement is valid — making it directly enforceable — or reject the application. Two features deserve emphasis. First, confirmation is not automatic: it requires a joint application by both parties and a favourable court ruling. Second, the ruling that confirms a valid agreement carries the same enforceability as a court judgment, which is what turns a private promise into a public remedy.

What the court will not confirm

The review is substantive, not a rubber stamp. The Supreme People's Court's interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law (revised in 2022, Judicial Interpretation No. 11 of 2022) sets out the material rules: what must be filed (Article 354) and the situations where the court will not accept the application at all (Article 355) — notably matters of personal status such as marriage, parent-child and adoption relations, and certain property-rights determinations. Where the application is accepted but fails review, Article 358 lists the grounds for rejection: among them, violation of mandatory provisions of law, harm to state, public or others' interests, breach of public order and good morals, violation of the principle of voluntariness, and unclear content. A settlement that is rejected returns to being an ordinary contract — the parties must renegotiate, re-mediate or litigate. For that reason the drafting of the settlement itself is as important as the application: a vague or over-reaching clause is the most common reason a confirmation fails.

Court-annexed mediation: two routes in

Mediation in China is not only a private affair. Under the Supreme People's Court Provisions on Invited Mediation (Judicial Interpretation No. 14 of 2016, effective 1 July 2016), courts invite mediation organisations and mediators to work with the docket. Before a case is filed, the court may refer the dispute to invited mediation (委派调解), generally within 30 days; after filing, the court may entrust the dispute to invited mediation (委托调解), within roughly 15 days for ordinary procedure and 7 days for summary procedure. The attraction of the pre-filing route is cost and speed, and a mediated outcome can then go through the same judicial-confirmation channel. For a foreign party the practical point is to treat the referral as a genuine opportunity, not a formality — a well-run mediation in this window frequently produces a confirmable settlement faster and cheaper than the trial it replaces.

Foreign settlements and the Singapore Convention: the gap to watch

Cross-border parties need one further caution. A settlement reached abroad, or a foreign-mediated settlement, does not enter China through the frameworks that recognise foreign court judgments or foreign arbitral awards. China signed the Singapore Convention on Mediation on 7 August 2019, but as of late 2026 it has not ratified it, so the Convention is not in force for China and there is currently no direct channel to enforce a foreign settlement agreement as such. On the domestic side, the State Council's Commercial Mediation Regulations took effect on 1 May 2026, building the domestic-law foundation for a future ratification — but for today, a foreign settlement must be enforced as a contract action, or the underlying dispute must be resolved through arbitration or litigation, to produce a judgment or award that China can recognise. A party that assumes its overseas settlement is directly enforceable in China is planning around a route that does not yet exist.

Practical points before you sign or apply

  • Know which stage you are in. A mediated settlement is a contract until judicial confirmation; only the court's confirming ruling is directly enforceable.
  • Apply jointly and in time. Confirmation needs both parties and a ruling — apply within the 30-day window of Article 201 of the Civil Procedure Law.
  • Draft for confirmation. Avoid clauses that are unclear, against mandatory law or over-reaching — these are the standard grounds for rejection.
  • Do not over-plan on foreign settlements. The Singapore Convention is not in force for China; enforce through a contract action or convert the dispute into a judgment or arbitral award.

How Tianni Law Firm Can Help

Tianni Law Firm (江苏天倪律师事务所), based in Nanjing, Jiangsu, advises foreign parties through Chinese commercial mediation and settlement — drafting settlements that survive judicial confirmation, running the Article 201 application, using court-annexed invited mediation before and after filing, and structuring the enforcement of cross-border settlements where the Singapore Convention does not yet reach. This article is general information, not legal advice; the Civil Procedure Law, the Supreme People's Court's judicial interpretations and the relevant regulations are applied case by case, so confirm the current official texts and the facts of the specific dispute before acting.

This article is provided by Tianni Law Firm for general information only and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For legal advice on a specific matter, please contact a qualified attorney.

Make the settlement stick.

We draft settlements that survive judicial confirmation, run the Article 201 application, and structure enforcement of cross-border settlements.

Related Articles